This has the added benefit of helping focus the viewer's attention back on the presenter, which is where it typically should be during a question-and-answer session. Instead of a "Thank You" type slide, the video feed simply switches away from the slideshow and cuts back to the video camera that's pointing at the presenter. and is able to use the content of that slide to answer many of the questions.Īnother technique is often used for presentations that are being video-recorded and archived. The presenter builds a final "Summary" slide that includes some graphs, photos, key statistics, formulas, etc. Some of the better presentations I've seen will anticipate the sort of questions that might be asked based on the audience and their background. For those reasons, it really serves no purpose. It contains the same amount of relevant information as the black "End of Presentation" screen that PowerPoint displays after the last slide (that is, zero). The "Thank You" slide is only visible for as long as it takes to ask the first question, then never seen again. The same thing ends up happening in almost every presentation: someone asks a question and the presenter rewinds to a previous slide in order to answer it. My group tends to work from a set of common templates that have "Thank You/Any Questions?" slides at the end by default. Make yourself comfortable, find the structure, language and pace you are comfortable with (and fit within the time limit). Try to present it to your friends/colleagues even pets or a rubber duck. ![]() Sidenote: I think this is your first presentation. I think you can trick the LaTeX/beamer by using \label. You can build your presentation in beamer, build your supporting appendix and merge the pdfs. Bigger graphs, detailed images, claims and references - just in case. You don't mention it in your speech but they who will read your slides later will fing the reference in eyblink if you would be asked, you can show both your claim and the reference in Q&A minutes.Īnother trick is to have couple of uncounted slides with extras. No one cares for referencing idea two minutes ago. If you need to show references and citations, do it at the time you talk about it. You can back your claims thoroughly later on stage you want to talk about your contribution, not the others'. You want the audience's attention and curiosity first, then you can comunicate your results. Long lists of anything is a show killer, references doubly so. The show here is not fancy, full of fireworks and othe ballast, but it is still a show. In academia you are selling your results, your department, your research. ![]() Presentations are there to sell the presenter's products. Perhaps also others see a benefit in doing so. I had acknowledged co-workers and helpful people at the beginning: kind of this work comes into existence thanks to institutions and people.My last slide contains the conclusions, so that the audience can replay in their mind the whole presentation and have handles for questions to ask.I say that in spoken words facing the audience, which is a much more open and inviting gesture.On the closing slide I have long since stopped to put the final thank-you-for-your-attention and/or any-questions? slide. Another option is to add a textual slide commenting on the references: that they are, say, 200 they date from those periods they have been published in such and such journals or proceedings a quick kind of meta analysis, that is.This gives the backdrop to your own story on why the references are important, other than plainly numerous. A graph showing the cross-citations or a timeline could be useful. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |